优惠:VirMach $14.4/年/512MB内存/15GB SSD/1TB流量/KVM/洛杉矶 附评测

官网地址：https://virmach.com

virmach算是低价kvm中的佼佼者了，不过限制也是比较严格的。此次活动不限新老用户，都可以参加，不过只能优惠码使用一次，博主入了一个la的，可以有十个机房可选，下面会放个简单的评测。1Ｇ内存以上的可以win。

可以月付，月付应该是1.6刀。不过年付会更便宜25%!

KVM-SSD512
CPU：1 vCore
内存：512 MB
空间：15 GB SSD（RAID 10）
流量：1 TB/月（1Gbps 端口）
IPv4：1
$14.4/年
优惠码：60FEB2017
购买地址

SSD1G KVM + 500Gbps Protection Bundle
CPU：1 vCore
内存：1024 MB
空间：20 GB SSD（RAID 10）
流量：1 TB/月（1Gbps 端口）
IPv4：1
$4.2/月
优惠码：60FEB2017
购买地址

数据中心和速度测试：
法兰克福：50.3.75.98 http://ffm.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
纽约：107.173.176.5 http://ny.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
达拉斯：23.95.41.200 http://dal.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
凤凰城：173.213.69.188 http://phx.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
洛杉矶：23.94.228.141 http://la.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
芝加哥：170.130.139.3 http://chi.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
西雅图：104.140.22.36 http://sea.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test
亚特兰大：107.172.25.131 http://atl.lg.virmach.com/100MB.test

Windows系统的VPS需要注意：

测试开始：

拿到的测试ip: 192.210.171.178

全国ping:

===开始测试下载速度和IO性能===
———————————————————————-
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 42.4MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 2.25MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 1.36MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 1.59MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 1.34MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 24.5MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 7.24MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 8.87MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 1.62MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 1.32MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 1.18MB/s
———————————————————————-
I/O speed(1st run) : 304 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 352 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 354 MB/s
Average I/O: 336.667 MB/s

===测试 [广州电信（超级信息港）] 的回程路由===
HOST: SillyFake-VM Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|– 10.9.3.193 0.0% 10 1.2 1.4 1.1 3.2 0.6
2.|– 10.9.5.141 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0
3.|– las-b3-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.0
4.|– 213.248.92.130 0.0% 10 0.7 2.7 0.7 4.6 1.2
5.|– 202.97.90.117 0.0% 10 1.6 2.5 0.9 4.5 1.1
6.|– 202.97.51.117 0.0% 10 171.3 170.4 168.8 171.9 1.1
7.|– 202.97.60.89 50.0% 10 169.3 169.3 169.3 169.4 0.0
8.|– 202.97.33.241 0.0% 10 185.2 183.1 181.3 185.2 1.4
9.|– 113.108.208.6 0.0% 10 172.6 172.8 171.1 174.5 1.1
10.|– 113.108.209.34 0.0% 10 173.6 173.9 173.5 176.8 1.0
11.|– 121.14.18.90 10.0% 10 173.3 171.6 170.8 174.3 1.3
12.|– 58.63.244.254 10.0% 10 177.3 174.3 173.5 177.3 1.5
===回程 [广州电信（超级信息港）] 路由测试结束===
===测试 [上海电信] 的回程路由===
HOST: SillyFake-VM Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|– 10.9.3.193 0.0% 10 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 0.0
2.|– 10.9.5.137 0.0% 10 0.3 2.9 0.3 13.9 5.3
3.|– las-b3-link.telia.net 20.0% 10 0.9 0.7 0.4 1.7 0.4
4.|– 213.248.92.130 0.0% 10 8.6 3.9 0.9 8.6 2.7
5.|– 202.97.50.25 0.0% 10 0.7 2.2 0.7 3.6 1.0
6.|– 202.97.58.173 30.0% 10 138.1 143.0 138.0 170.0 12.0
7.|– ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.|– 202.97.50.237 0.0% 10 144.7 138.3 135.8 144.7 2.5
9.|– 101.95.120.157 0.0% 10 143.5 140.9 139.6 143.5 1.2
10.|– 101.95.206.218 90.0% 10 160.0 160.0 160.0 160.0 0.0
11.|– 124.74.233.66 70.0% 10 161.2 161.1 161.0 161.2 0.1
12.|– ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
13.|– 61.129.87.26 0.0% 10 153.0 146.8 146.0 153.0 2.2
14.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 10 164.3 166.0 163.4 180.9 5.3
15.|– 222.73.199.225 0.0% 10 151.6 152.3 151.5 154.2 0.9
16.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 10 163.7 174.2 163.4 203.9 15.7
17.|– 222.73.199.225 0.0% 10 151.9 157.7 151.5 208.9 18.0
18.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 10 163.5 168.5 163.4 189.5 8.1
19.|– 222.73.199.225 0.0% 10 206.2 175.1 151.6 206.2 25.2
20.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 10 164.5 178.2 163.4 294.3 41.0
21.|– 222.73.199.225 0.0% 10 151.7 161.8 151.7 230.2 24.3
22.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 10 163.5 217.8 163.4 654.6 154.1
23.|– 222.73.199.225 0.0% 10 152.1 152.0 151.6 152.5 0.3
24.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 9 163.6 212.8 163.3 599.5 145.0
25.|– 222.73.199.225 0.0% 9 153.5 152.7 151.6 156.3 1.6
26.|– 222.73.199.226 0.0% 9 163.4 208.6 163.4 516.3 116.3
27.|– 222.73.199.225 11.1% 9 155.6 152.7 151.6 156.0 1.9
28.|– 222.73.199.226 12.5% 8 163.4 163.9 163.4 166.9 1.3
29.|– 222.73.199.225 12.5% 8 151.6 151.7 151.6 151.9 0.1
30.|– 222.73.199.226 12.5% 8 163.7 173.9 163.5 205.0 17.0
===回程 [上海电信] 路由测试结束===
===测试 [重庆联通] 的回程路由===
HOST: SillyFake-VM Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|– 10.9.3.193 0.0% 10 1.2 1.5 1.1 4.7 1.1
2.|– 10.9.5.137 0.0% 10 0.4 3.7 0.3 31.8 9.9
3.|– las-b3-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0
4.|– chinaunicom-ic-155914-las 10.0% 10 312.5 312.4 306.3 315.2 2.7
5.|– 219.158.102.81 0.0% 10 250.2 248.9 247.3 250.2 1.1
6.|– 219.158.98.9 0.0% 10 246.3 247.6 244.8 249.6 1.4
7.|– 219.158.112.161 0.0% 10 309.6 307.8 294.3 312.4 5.3
8.|– 219.158.16.250 10.0% 10 330.7 328.3 318.9 332.0 4.2
9.|– 113.207.25.214 40.0% 10 340.5 339.0 337.4 340.5 1.2
10.|– 113.207.25.62 10.0% 10 330.7 333.4 327.0 341.7 4.3
11.|– 113.207.32.65 20.0% 10 321.4 328.3 321.4 339.0 5.3
===回程 [重庆联通] 路由测试结束===
===测试 [天津移动] 的回程路由===
HOST: SillyFake-VM Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
1.|– 10.9.3.193 0.0% 10 1.3 1.6 1.1 4.9 1.2
2.|– 10.9.5.137 0.0% 10 0.4 7.7 0.4 37.6 11.0
3.|– las-b3-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.0
4.|– las-b21-link.telia.net 0.0% 10 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.7 0.2
5.|– chinamobile-ic-319994-las 0.0% 10 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.3 0.1
6.|– 223.118.10.85 0.0% 10 0.7 2.4 0.7 4.2 1.3
7.|– 221.183.15.145 0.0% 10 260.2 260.1 259.6 261.5 0.6
8.|– 221.176.17.61 0.0% 10 307.9 258.1 249.8 307.9 19.0
9.|– 221.176.19.221 10.0% 10 179.0 184.4 179.0 226.4 15.8
10.|– ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
11.|– 221.183.13.42 10.0% 10 196.3 196.3 196.2 196.4 0.1
12.|– 211.103.87.9 10.0% 10 200.4 200.4 200.3 200.7 0.1
===回程 [天津移动] 路由测试结束===
===开始进行全国PING测试===
线路 节点数目 最快节点 延迟 最慢节点 延迟 平均延迟

===进行全国PING测试结束===
{start testing Linode日本 ping}
PING speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=1 ttl=54 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=2 ttl=54 time=106 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=3 ttl=54 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=4 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=5 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=6 ttl=54 time=106 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=7 ttl=54 time=105 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=8 ttl=54 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=9 ttl=54 time=103 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_req=10 ttl=54 time=105 ms

— speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics —
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 103.612/104.936/106.638/1.161 ms
{end testing}
{start testing Vultr日本 ping}
PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=1 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=2 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=3 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=4 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=5 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=6 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=7 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=8 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=9 ttl=54 time=109 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_req=10 ttl=54 time=109 ms

— hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics —
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 109.524/109.587/109.690/0.299 ms
{end testing}
{start testing Budgetvm洛杉矶 ping}
PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=1 ttl=60 time=0.526 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=2 ttl=60 time=0.715 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=3 ttl=60 time=0.644 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=4 ttl=60 time=0.506 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=5 ttl=60 time=0.668 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=6 ttl=60 time=0.588 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=7 ttl=60 time=0.621 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=8 ttl=60 time=0.659 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=9 ttl=60 time=0.712 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_req=10 ttl=60 time=0.662 ms

— 192.157.214.6 ping statistics —
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.506/0.630/0.715/0.068 ms
{end testing}
{start testing kdatacenter韩国SK ping}
PING downloadtest.kdatacenter.com (211.33.122.250) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=1 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=2 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=3 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=4 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=5 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=6 ttl=53 time=144 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=7 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=8 ttl=53 time=143 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=9 ttl=53 time=144 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_req=10 ttl=53 time=143 ms

— downloadtest.kdatacenter.com ping statistics —
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9012ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 143.194/143.601/144.885/0.495 ms
{end testing}
{start testing 星光韩国KT ping}
PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=243 time=150 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=243 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=243 time=150 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=243 time=150 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=243 time=150 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=243 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=243 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=243 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=243 time=151 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=243 time=151 ms

总体感觉还可以的，ip好像是ColoCrossing有限公司的，毕竟是kvm还是la线路。网友反馈比Rectified家的kvm稳定好多，毕竟卖了这么久了。vps上可以加个锐速什么的，速度会好一些。它家的后台面板整合的还不错，一般的功能都有了。